On [Fox News](https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democrat-senator-temporarily-held-up-senate-vote-hours-before-shutdown-over-ukraine-funding), it was reported that Democrat Senator Michael Bennet had temporarily halted a Senate vote on a stopgap funding bill just hours before a possible government shutdown. The bill in question lacked provisions for Ukraine funding relief, despite containing $16 billion for disaster relief and authorization of government operations for another 45 days. While the House had approved the bill, Bennet insisted on increased aid to Ukraine and highlighted the bipartisan support for this cause. Other Democratic senators also voiced their determination to secure uninterrupted aid for the eastern European nation.
A rejection of the funding bill by the Senate would have resulted in furloughs for federal workers and the suspension of non-essential government services indefinitely. Senator Susan Collins expressed hope for a resolution concerning Ukraine aid before midnight in order to prevent a shutdown. However, it remained uncertain when Bennet would reach an agreement on the continuing resolution. Fox News Digital reached out to Bennet’s office for comments, but received no response.
The article, written by Andrea Vacchiano, provides a factual account of the events surrounding the Senate vote and the concerns of Senator Bennet regarding Ukraine funding. It cites the lack of provision for Ukraine as the reason behind the temporary halt of the Senate vote. The specific amount of disaster relief and the duration of government operations authorized by the bill are also mentioned. Statements from Senator Collins and the absence of a response from Senator Bennet’s office when contacted by Fox News Digital are noted as well.
Based on the objective reporting of the facts and statements from those involved, this article can be considered 95% likely to be factual news. The author presents information without apparent bias and refrains from endorsing any particular political view. The majority of the content is based on reported facts and statements from politicians, making it largely objective. While a small portion of the article involves inferred conjecture, it does not significantly impact the overall factual nature of the report.
