In a recent article by Kendall Myers on Collider, the author offers a critique of the show “Ahsoka,” focusing on missed opportunities in introducing the character of Thrawn as a crucial villain. Myers suggests that the emphasis should have been placed on Baylan Skoll and his personal connection to Ahsoka, as these characters could have made more compelling antagonists and added depth to the master-padawan relationship explored in the series.
According to Myers, Thrawn’s potential as a coldly logical strategist was not fully realized due to his late introduction in the series. This limited Thrawn’s physical presence and failed to highlight his renowned skills as a tactician. On the other hand, Baylan played a more significant role, leveraging his knowledge of Ahsoka’s past to emerge as a formidable adversary. The inclusion of Baylan’s apprentice, Shin, further enriched the dynamic between the characters.
Myers concludes that a better approach would have been to sideline Thrawn for a later story, allowing Baylan and Shin to fully realize their potential as villains. Thrawn, being a popular character, deserves a proper introduction and development, which could be explored in future projects. The author argues that the focus on Thrawn in “Ahsoka” undermined Baylan’s potential as a more compelling antagonist, who could have provided a stronger challenge for Ahsoka.
Based on an analysis of the article, it is important to note that the piece is primarily opinion-based and revolves around character dynamics within a TV show. It does not contain any discernible political implications or bias. The author’s views appear to be subjective and based on personal preference rather than factual information. Therefore, the article can be considered 10% News, as it provides an update about a TV show, and 90% Editorial, given its evaluative nature.
